Mission management

This chapter presents the general management of the mission. The items presented in this section are: schedule for the space system Catarina-A1; cost estimation for the space system Catarina-A1; product tree for the mission and the space system Catarina-A1; risk management for the mission and the space system Catarina-A1, WBS for the space system Catarina-A1 and information about the launch.

Schedule

This section comprises the updated schedule control of the Catarina-A1 space system.

Schedule definition

Fig. 5 illustrates the mission schedule at this date. The schedule has been continuously updated since its first draft presented at the Mission Design Review (MDR) [22].

Since the technical development teams are not entirely identical for both space systems, only the management team, there are date differences for reviews regarding the design, integration, and testing of each space system. The present general schedule is related to the deliverables from the space system Catarina-A1, the object of this revision.

Schedule

Fig. 5 Catarina-A1 space system’s schedule.

The launch is currently scheduled for March 2025. More information on the potential launch can be found in Launch.

Schedule control

Fig. 6 shows the dependency diagram for critical packages. The red arrows indicate the critical path, which corresponds to the group of dependent items that present greater criticality for the project since they do not allow for much margin for scheduling flexibility.

Schedule

Fig. 6 Dependency diagram and critical path for Catarina-A1’s.

As can be seen, four sets of packages generate criticality at the current stage of the project: the frequency license coordination, the acquisition/purchase of critical items for the space system, the acquisition/purchase of the deployer, and the AIT tests at LIT/INPE.

Frequency license coordination, as estimated by ANATEL, typically takes between 8 and 12 months to complete. This process must be finalized before launcher integration can commence, expected by December 2024. For the Catarina-A1 space system, frequency license coordination began in July 2023 and is currently ongoing, with an anticipated completion date in September 2024.

The acquisition or purchase of critical items, such as antennas, structures, and modules, with low lead times (ranging from 4 to 12 weeks) along with the acquisition of the payload EDC, significantly influences the initiation of AIT tests at INPE. To allow for a 2-month window for potential date reservation with LIT/INPE, all items for the flight model must be on-site at Florianópolis - SC by the beginning of September 2024. To achieve this, the procurement process for these items must commence no later than May or June 2024. Regarding the EDC, it must be available at Florianópolis - SC until July 2024.

The acquisition of the deployer together with the realization of AIT tests is necessary for the start of the launcher integration, 90 days before the launch, at December 2024. The launch is estimated not before March 2025. More information about the launch can be found at Launch. This leaves a window for the AIT tests between September and November 2024. As for the acquisition of the deployer, the procurement process must be initiated before July 2024.

Procurement status

Table 3 indicates the current status of the purchase of major items necessary to carry out the mission for the Catarina-A1 space system. Solar panels are already available at Florianópolis - SC for flight model integration. Other items listed are scheduled to initiate the procurement process in May 2024, except for the deployer which is scheduled to initiate its process at Juin or July 2024.

Table 3 Procurement Status.

Item

Estimated Lead time - weeks

Status

Solar panel

32 - 38

ready

Antenna

8 - 12

not initiated

Structure

4

not initiated

EPS module

4

not initiated

ACS components

4

not initiated

OBDH module

4

not initiated

TTC module

4

not initiated

ExpLora Payload

3

EM ready - FM not initiated

Deployer

12

not initiated

Frequency license coordination

Table 4 indicates the current status of frequency license coordination for the Catarina-A1 space system. The process is currently in progress and is estimated to be complete by September 2024.

Table 4 Frequency license coordination status.

Etapa

Status

Registration at SEI

Ready

Login TIES

Ready

Official request at ANATEL

in progress

Qualification at UIT system

not initiated

Software installation and API form complete

not initiated

API publication

not initiated

Final notification at UIT

not initiated

Cost estimation

The concept of cost described here extends beyond financial resources to include human resources, infrastructure, and consumables. This section introduces the CBS for the Catarina-A1 project. It provides a visual breakdown of all project expenses divided into categories, enabling easy tracking of each category’s expenditure. Additionally, it includes the CER, which offers a projected estimate of these expenses throughout the project duration.

Cost breakdown structure

The CBS defined for space system Catarina-A1 of Catarina Constellation is illustrated in Fig. 7. In this CBS, references can be made to the organizational chart presented in Project members.

The categories indicated are: Direct human resources, Internal infrastructure, Supplies and other direct costs, Sub-contracts, and Expenses not linked to production. Quantities such as margin and profit are not included in the CBS.

In Fig. 7, the boxes highlighted in blue indicate that such categories may undergo subsequent break-ups and the yellow boxes indicate categories and subcategories that potentially include indirect costs.

CBS

Fig. 7 Catarina-A1 System’s Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS).

The Human Resources category includes the official collaborators indicated in Project members from the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) and the team provided by the National Institute for Space Research in Natal (INPE-COENE) for the mission, yet to be defined.

Regarding the internal facilities, references are made to: (i) the UFSC Spacelab laboratory that will be responsible for testing, manufacturing and integration of the Catarina-A1; (ii) the laboratories of the Thermal Fluid Flow Group (T2F) that will be used to perform vibration and vacuum tests; (iii) to the ISI Embedded Systems laboratory that will be used for testing embedded systems; and (iv) to the infrastructure of the Estação Multi-Missão de Natal at INPE-RN that will assist in mission control.

In the category of supplies, the Product Tree itself stands out as a guide for costs with materials and parts (Fig. 9), in addition to the testing and external purchases. Finally, as costs not linked to production, general and administrative expenses stand out.

Cost estimate report

Hypothesis used

In the elaboration of the current version of this document, the following assumptions were used:

  • Economic conditions: the budget for the Catarina Constellation - Fleet A project was already outlined at the time of prospecting with the financiers, and its allocation made by the Brazilian Space Agency (AEB);

  • Currency: the dollar/euro exchange rate is considered to be R$6.00;

  • Heritage/Technology Readiness Level: see document of TRL;

  • Design Status: see Sections Schedule and Work breakdown structure;

Cost breakdown tables

To detail the categories shown in CBS (Cost breakdown structure), the CBT contains the estimated costs of each item mentioned above, taking into account the hypothesis presented in Hypothesis used.

Table 5 lists the project costs as a whole, and Table 6 shows the Services category in detail. Table 7 shows the values of consumable items taken from the Product Tree of System Catarina-A1.

Operational costs are not accounted for due to the possibility of aggregating this cost into a future project. For clarification, the operational costs estimated are related only to human resources for 1 year responsible for the connection and download of data from the satellites during its passage over the EMMN.

Table 5 Estimated costs to the project - Catarina-A1.

Category

Value [R$]

Percentage

Human Resources

388.280,00

22,8

Consumables and capital

781.592,00

46,0

Services

215.184,88

12,7

Members transportation

7.000,00

0,4

Daily Rates

12.000,00

0,7

Administrative fees

296.059,12

17,4

Total

1.700.116,00

100

Table 6 Estimated costs to the project - Services - Catarina-A1.

Services

Available value [R$]

Value spent [R$]

AIT tests - LIT

60.120,88

0

Secondary service costs

38.000,00

0

Other (importation fees)

117.064,00

5.580

Table 7 Estimated costs to the project - consumable items.

Material

Available value [R$]

cost estimative [R$]

value spent [R$]

Structure

44.000,00

44.000,00

0

Solar panel

340.000,00

340.000,00

339.900

Interface plates

8.352,00

8.352,00

0

Antenna module

83.067,00

60.000,00

0

OBDH EM

24.000,00

24.000,00

0

TTC EM

32.000,00

32.000,00

0

EPS EM

28.000,00

28.000,00

0

EM Battery module

12.000,00

12.000,00

0

Payload EM

32.000,00

32.000,00

0

OBDH FM

36.000,00

36.000,00

0

TTC FM

44.000,00

44.000,00

0

EPS FM

40.000,00

40.000,00

0

FM Battery module

20.000,00

20.000,00

0

Payload FM

6.600,00

6.600,00

0

Cables

4.176,00

4.176,00

0

Bolts, resins, etc

4.176,00

4.176,00

0

Others

23.221,00

23.221,00

23.221,00

Deployer

180.000,00

0

The secondary service cost herein accounts for the cost related to the preparation for launch (transportation of the space system and others related). The cost for the launch is not listed here since the probable launch for the space system Catarina-A1 will be a free-of-charge launch due to a collaboration with AEB. More details can be found in the Launch section of this document.

Importation fees for international purchases are classified as Services cost - other. All items indicated in table Table 7 are purchased from suppliers from outside Brazil except for the solar panels, structure, and minor electronic items such as cables and others. Cost estimative for international purchased items in Table 7 do not take into account importation fees since all importation fees are applied to the service cost - others - importation fees presented in table Table 6. Importation fees are estimated at 30 percent of the total value of the item.

The cost for a 3U deployer is also listed in table Table 7 although not initially considered in the project’s main budget. Possibilities for extra budget or relocation of resources for this item are being considered at the current stage of the project.

It is highlighted here that no or minimum financial resources were spent on items for the Engineering Model (EM). However, the EM is in an advanced stage of completeness, as is described in later sections of this document. The explanation for this fact is that the space system Catarina-A1 is based on the same design as the space system GOLDS-UFSC, designed in parallel by the same technical team. The EM used for the Catarina-A1 is then the same as the one applied to GOLDS-UFSC.

Cost sensitivity analysis

Referring to Cost breakdown structure stand out the cost categories of:

  • External Services: The launch is included in this category, and it has an extremely variable cost, depending on the launch location, the time of year, the number of items launched in the chosen launcher, and the economic and political conditions - both international and internal at the country where the launch will take place; However, negotiations of a free of charge launch based on a cooperation agreement between AEB and a Launch provider company is currently being discussed. Operational phase costs are also in this category and are not contemplated in the current budget.

  • Materials and Parts: The variation of the dollar and the lack of components in the market generate insecurity regarding some specific components of the Product Tree and their respective parts. However, due to the use of the EM from GOLDS-UFSC applied to the Catarina-A1, some resources initially reserved for the EM may be used to mitigate this possible extra cost.

  • Transport and Insurance: Highly dependent on launch parameters, this category also suffers from the same restrictions as the first item. However, the possible launch is inside Brazilian territory, contributing to mitigating this possible extra cost.

Such categories generate risks linked to project cost and are indicated in Risks identification, related to risk assessments.

Recomendations

Specifically for the items described in Cost sensitivity analysis, it is recommended to relocate or increase a small amount of budget for the operational phase (human resources during the operational phase) and possibly extra cost due to the procurement of the deployer.

Product tree

Fig. 8 illustrates the Product Tree of the mission of Fleet A of Catarina Constellation. In it, the space system and ground system branches are present. Fleet A’s mission is managed from UFSC and ISI-SE and operated from EMMN throughout the operational phase – Launch and Initial Orbit Phase and Routine Operation Phase – and shares existing resources (infrastructure, equipment, personnel, etc.) with other missions like Global Open Collecting Data System (GOLDS-UFSC).

Since the two space systems in the fleet are architecturally distinct, each has its own Product Tree.

Product tree

Fig. 8 Fleet A’s Product Tree.

The product tree of the Catarina-A1 satellite is the project breakdown into successive levels of hardware and software products (or elements). The product tree of the project can be seen in the diagram of Fig. 9. As shown, the satellite was divided into eight segments.

Product tree

Fig. 9 Product tree diagram of the satellite.

The supplier of each element of the product tree is available in Table 8.

Table 8 Suppliers of the product tree’s elements.

Element

Supplier

Satellite

UFSC

Mechanical Structure

Usiped

EPS Hardware

SpaceLab

EPS Firmware

SpaceLab

Battery Module

SpaceLab

Solar Panels

Orbital

OBDH Hardware

SpaceLab

TTC Hardware

SpaceLab

TTC Firmware

SpaceLab

Antenna

ISISpace

ACS

SpaceLab

Harness

SpaceLab

Interface Boards

SpaceLab

EDC

INPE-RN

ExpLoRa

SpaceLab

GSE Software

SpaceLab

Work breakdown structure

The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is presented as a diagram in Fig. 10. The WBS is divided into work packages (WP) as can be seen in the diagram. The description of each WP is detailed in Table 9. In this table, the completed packages are highlighted in red and the ongoing packages are highlighted in blue.

WBS

Fig. 10 Catarina-A1’s WBS diagram.

Table 9 Work packages definition.

Work Packages

Document Emission

Contributions

A1-WP0 Management

A1-WP0.1 Project Management

Management plan; Schedule; WBS; Cost estimate report; Documentation templates

Product tree

A1-WP0.2 Acquisitions

Cost estimate report; Schedule

A1-WP1 Quality Assurance

A1-WP1.1 Product Assurance

Product assurance plan

Fault Tree Analysis report; Critical items list

A1-WP1.2 Fault Analysis

Fault Tree Analysis report; Critical items list

Product Assurance plan

A1-WP1.3 Validation and Verification

Qualification status list; Logbook; Verification plan; Declared components list; Data sheet; Justification document

Fault Tree Analysis report; Critical items list; AIT Plan

A1-WP2 Architecture Study and Specification

A1-WP2.1 Operation Scenario Definition; A1-WP2.2 Architecture Definition; A1-WP2.3 Requirements Definition

Technical requirements; Design definition; Design justification; Technical budget; Requirement justification; Trade-off reports

Technological readiness level report

A1-WP2.4 Simulation and Analysis

Space Debris analysis report

A1-WP3 EM and FM Definition

A1-WP3.1 Application Design

System enviromental specifications; System development plan; System specifications

A1-WP3.2 Platform Design

A1-WP3.3 Application Implementation

A1-WP3.4 Platform Implementation

A1-WP4 Payload Validation

A1-WP4.1 Environmental Tests

System Test procedure; System Test report

Satellite V&V plan

A1-WP4.2 Payload Integration

A1-WP5 EM Integration

A1-WP5.1 Subsystems Integration and Tests

System Test procedure; System Test report

A1-WP5.2 EM Satellite Integration

A1-WP5.3 Integration and Tests with Decoder

A1-WP6 EM Validation

A1-WP6.1 Validation Scenarios Specification

System V&V plan

Satellite V&V plan

A1-WP6.2 Project Validation

A1-WP7 FM Integration

A1-WP7.1 Subsystems Integration and Tests

System Test procedure; System Test report

A1-WP7.2 FM Satellite Integration

A1-WP8 FM Validation

A1-WP8.1 Validation Scenarios Specification

System V&V plan

Satellite V&V plan

A1-WP8.2 Project Validation

Risk management

A risk is an event that threatens the project’s success, even if partially. Therefore, this plan aims to help identify adverse events at an early stage, handle them, and mitigate them. The development of this project will be based on a qualitative risk analysis standard. This depends on crossing two metrics: the probability of risk occurrence and the impact of risk occurrence.

Risks identification

The identified risks are displayed below, classified by source (programmatic, technical, or extern), likelihood (Very Rare-Expected), and consequences (1-5). The trends from the last review to this one are also displayed. The risk ID is related to the Fleet A of Catarina Constellation and also comprises risks belonging to the space system A2 and now closed risk, not addressed in this document.

A total of five risks are indicated as high, all identified as technical ones. They are related to the commissioning of the satellite and the development in-house of the EPS and OBDH systems. No risk worsened in the period between the SRR and this CDR, where some improved and most were unchanged.

Programatic risks

Fig. 11 Programatic risks - Catarina-A1.

Technical risks analysis

Fig. 12 Technical risks analysis - Catarina-A1.

Technical risks trends

Fig. 13 Technical risks trends - Catarina-A1.

External risks analysis

Fig. 14 External risks analysis - Catarina-A1.

External risks trends

Fig. 15 External risks trends - Catarina-A1.

Launch

A cooperation agreement is being discussed between a private launcher company and AEB to provide the launch of the Space System Catarina-A1 from Catarina Constellation. As indicated in Fig. 5 the launch is scheduled for March 2025, from Alcântara Space Center - Brazil.

The cooperation agreement provides a payload of 15 kg for AEB to be used for nanosatellites launch. The agreement does not include the CubeSat deployer and this cost was added to the current mission. Preliminary estimates indicate that for a 15 kg payload, it is possible to carry the space system Catarina-A1 (2U with 2.6 kg), the space system A2 (3U with 2.3 kg) and a third 2U space system with a total mass maximum of 2.6 kg. The other 7.5 kg accounts for three 3U deployer masses and two 1U dummies masses. Values for mass estimates are based on the ISIS 3U deployer. More details can be seen in Table 10.

Two possible launch orbits are being analyzed: SSO orbit with 500 km altitude and a \(43^{\circ}\) inclination orbit with 500 km altitude. Calculations for communication time and decay are presented in a later section.

Table 10 Estimated mass and composition of the proposed launch.

Item

Estimated mass (kg)

Load

Deployer 3U

2

A1 + dummy load

Deployer 3U

2

A2

Deployer 3U

2

CubeSat 2U + dummy load

A1

2.6 (max)

A2

2.3

2U

2.6 (max)

Dummy loads (2 units)

1.5 (max - 0.75 each unit)

Total

15

-